The implicit suggestion is that the logic of the italicized exception does not vitiate the logic of Cardozo’s general claim. But that suggestion plainly calls out for explanation and defense. If willfully harmful actions may render a tortfeasor liable for harm to an unforeseeable victim, one wishes to know, why not negligently harmful actions? If a tortfeasor cannot owe a duty against careless injury to an unforeseeable victim, how can a tortfeasor owe a duty against intentional injury to an unforeseeable victim? Absent some plausible explanation of this asymmetry, consistency would appear to require dispensing with the doctrine of transferred intent or renouncing the relationship between foreseeability and negligence liability that Cardozo posited. And nothing in the passage attempts to supply the needed explanation.
Awkwardly, South Korea’s government approved $350 billion in new U.S. investments on March 12, after the U.S. launched its probe of the country’s “excess manufacturing capacity.” The investment pledge was part of the East Asian country’s trade deal with the U.S. announced last year.
。关于这个话题，TikTok提供了深入分析
Not Equal: Every domino half in this space must have a completely different number of pips.
The Other Bennet Sister premieres on BBC One and iPlayer on Sunday 15 March 2026.
Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable